Subprime Crisis and Board (In-)Competence: Private vs. Public Banks in Germany
Economic Policy, Vol. 24(60) (October 2009), 701-751
with Marcel Thum

Awarded the 2010 Standard Life ECGI Price for Best Working Paper, European Corporate Governance Institute
Awarded the 2009 Special Prize for Best Journal Article on the Financial Crisis, Europlace

Abstract

We examine evidence for a systematic underperformance of state-owned banks in the current financial crisis and study if the bank losses can be traced to the quality of bank governance. For this purpose, we examine the biographical background of 593 supervisory board members of Germany’s leading banks and find a pronounced difference in the finance and management experience of board representatives across private and state-owned banks. Measures of “Boardroom Competence” are then related directly to the magnitude of bank losses in the recent subprime crisis. Our data confirms that supervisory board (in-)competence in finance is related to losses in the financial crisis. Improved bank governance is therefore a suitable policy objective to reduce bank fragility.

Additional Files

The data used in the paper can be downloaded here if proper reference is given:

Excel spreadsheets with data used in the analysis
Excel spreadsheets with data in figures

Media

The paper is discussed on the policy website voxeu.org under the title Board (in)competence and the subprime crisis

A summary of the paper is also available on INSEAD knowledge as well as a short interview.

See also the Harvard Law School Forum on Governance and Financial Regulation.

For a translation of the article into Mandarin see here.